Week · Market review

Week: US demand holds up as energy and borrowing costs rise

Information from 25 September to 1 October points to a clear contrast: US households and businesses are still spending, but financing and energy have not become cheaper. Releases at the end of the week added evidence about earlier months; they did not establish the final result for the third quarter.

Period covered: 2026-09-25 – 2026-10-01Information as of 8 min read

What changed in the latest information?

The 30 September releases included US spending and revised growth data, preliminary German and French inflation, and China’s factory survey. Long-term US Treasury yields ended the month above their August levels.

What remains relevant?

The US and euro-area policy rate increases made in September remain in effect. Strong sales can support company profits, but energy and new borrowing costs can absorb part of those profits.

Week

What happened

The week: new figures explained why business costs have not eased

US equipment orders and consumer sentiment released on 25 September pointed in different directions: business investment plans held up better than household confidence. The US and Chinese tariff-relief lists announced on 27 September were not yet tariffs in force. Long-term US Treasury yields rose further on 28 September. The August spending figures released on 30 September provided a more direct measure of demand: households bought more despite no increase in their real income.

In Europe, preliminary German and French inflation releases explained the end of the week. Energy prices were rising faster in both countries. China’s manufacturing survey moved back above its expansion threshold, but new orders did not strengthen. Higher production and better profitability therefore need to be assessed separately.

US spending grew, but household income did not rise after inflation

US household spending supported economic growth in August. On 30 September, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported that spending increased by 0.6% over the month after removing price changes. However, inflation-adjusted disposable income was unchanged. The increase in spending was therefore not matched by growth in current income. Wages, savings and access to credit will matter for whether households can sustain that pace.

The price figures did not show a fresh decline in annual inflation. In the data revised on 30 September, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index was 3.4% higher in August than a year earlier; excluding food and energy, the increase was 3.0%. July’s figures in the same revised series were identical. Comparing July’s earlier published estimate with August’s new figure would confuse a change in historical estimates with a change in prices.

? Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index: what does it measure?

The index, known as PCE, measures changes in prices of goods and services bought for consumers, including some spending on their behalf. Excluding food and energy helps separate frequently volatile prices; 3.0% is annual price growth, not a monthly change or growth in the quantity consumed.

US real spending rose in August while real disposable income, after tax and adjusted for prices, was flat; annual inflation excluding food and energy was unchanged from the revised July rate.
US real spending rose in August while real disposable income, after tax and adjusted for prices, was flat; annual inflation excluding food and energy was unchanged from the revised July rate.

The same agency revised second-quarter real gross domestic product growth from a 1.5% to a 2.2% annualised rate, or roughly 0.6% over the quarter. Higher investment and spending estimates indicate firmer demand in April–June. This was not a September growth surge: the first estimate for July–September will be published on 29 October.

The US ten-year yield rose from 4.75% to 5.29% during September

Long-term US borrowing costs increased during September. The ten-year Treasury yield stood at 5.29% on 30 September, compared with 4.75% on 31 August, a rise of 0.54 percentage points. Its increase on 30 September alone was 0.03 percentage points. The whole month’s rise cannot be attributed to yesterday’s consumer-spending release.

? Yields and basis points: how should the change be read?

The US Treasury table gives a standardised annual yield for each maturity. One basis point is 0.01 percentage points, so an increase of 0.54 percentage points equals 54 basis points. This is not an investment return: when yields rise, the price of an existing fixed-rate bond generally falls.

The US ten-year yield rose 54 basis points in September and 85 over the third quarter. These are yield changes, not bond returns.
The US ten-year yield rose 54 basis points in September and 85 over the third quarter. These are yield changes, not bond returns.

Over the full calendar third quarter, from 30 June to 30 September, the ten-year yield rose from 4.44% to 5.29%. That matters for long-duration bond funds and businesses that need to refinance. September’s policy rate increase forms part of the backdrop, but market yields also reflect inflation expectations, bond supply and the compensation investors require for lending over a longer period.

For your investments

Let’s discuss your portfolio

Book a conversation
FINANCIAL FREEDOM01 / 04

Investment results since 1999

Are you beating
global equities?

PortfolioGlobal equity index*
Cumulative return: portfolio +1,152%; global equity index +592%. Both series start at 0%.
+80.9%higher portfolio value
at the end of the period

Jan 1999–Jun 2026 · EUR · Cumulative return, %
Linear scale · * MSCI World → MSCI ACWI.
Past performance does not guarantee future returns.

And during market falls? →
FINANCIAL FREEDOM02 / 04

Historical comparison

How far did it fall?
How long to recover?

PortfolioGlobal equity index*

Decline from the previous high

Maximum monthly drawdown: portfolio −25.2%; global equity index −53.8%.

Longest recovery to the previous high

Portfolio: 35 months. Global equities: 158 months. The bars use the same scale.

Jan 1999–Jun 2026 · EUR · Monthly data
* MSCI World → MSCI ACWI.
Past performance does not guarantee future returns.

FINANCIAL FREEDOM03 / 04

Personal investment consultation

Already investing?

Let’s review your portfolio.

Yet to start
investing?

Let’s build your first
investment plan.

Let’s discuss your situation →
FINANCIAL FREEDOM04 / 04
Martynas Juška

Personal investment
consultation

Martynas
Juška

Investment manager

Managing a portfolio
of more than€100 million

Book a conversation ↗

The first conversation is free.

German energy prices are rising faster, but other prices are not accelerating uniformly

On 30 September, Germany’s statistical office estimated annual September inflation at 3.3%, up from 2.9% in August. Energy inflation accelerated from 10.5% to 14.9%. However, annual price growth excluding food and energy remained at 2.4%, while services inflation slowed from 2.8% to 2.7%. A higher headline rate does not mean that all costs have started rising faster.

Energy drove faster German headline inflation in September, while annual price growth excluding food and energy was unchanged.
Energy drove faster German headline inflation in September, while annual price growth excluding food and energy was unchanged.

France’s preliminary September inflation measured under the common European Union methodology, released the same day, rose from 2.6% to 3.4%. European Central Bank Executive Board member Isabel Schnabel stressed the impact of higher energy prices on other prices and expectations on 30 September. This was a new assessment, not a new interest-rate decision: the 2.50% deposit rate has been in effect since 16 September.

? Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices: why can it differ?

The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices allows price growth across European Union countries to be compared under a common methodology. Its coverage and weights can differ from the national index, so France’s 3.4% figure here is not its national-index reading.

Chinese manufacturing recovers, but orders and profits are different measures

China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported on 30 September that its manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index, or PMI, rose from 49.8 to 50.1 in September. The production index strengthened to 51.7, but the new-orders reading edged down from 50.6 to 50.5. Companies increased production, yet the survey did not show a broader acceleration in orders.

? Purchasing Managers’ Index: why does 50 matter?

The business survey compares activity with the previous month. A reading above 50 generally indicates expansion, while one below 50 indicates contraction. A reading of 50.1 does not mean production grew by 50.1%; the input-price survey index is likewise not the percentage increase in actual prices.

The raw-material purchase-price index meanwhile rose from 56.6 to 60.8. This is an important qualification to the stronger production reading: producing more does not necessarily mean earning more. Chinese industrial businesses need to cover higher costs, while European equipment and materials suppliers need actual new orders, not just higher output at their customers.

US crude stocks rose, but finished-fuel inventories fell

On 30 September, the US Energy Information Administration released inventories for the week ending 25 September. Commercial crude stocks stood at 427.3 million barrels, 2.6% above the comparable week a year earlier. Petrol inventories, however, were 7.4% lower and distillates, including diesel and heating products, were 14.9% lower. All three percentages use the same year-on-year comparison principle.

This distinction matters for transport and industrial companies: crude in storage is not yet fuel delivered to a driver. If refineries process less crude, fuel availability can remain constrained even as crude inventories rise. That could support refiners’ selling prices while increasing hauliers’ fuel bills; actual prices and company profits still need to be assessed separately.

Investment manager Martynas Juška during a presentation

Investment consultation

Do your investments work together?

Review where your money is invested, how much depends on a single market and whether your plan fits your goals. Leave with clearer next steps.

Discuss your investments

See the consultation process and terms on the registration page.

Week

What matters now

A bond buyer and a company refinancing a loan face different opportunities

For a new US bond buyer, a higher yield offers the prospect of more future income. The same change is adverse for the prices of existing long-term fixed-rate bonds. Property businesses, utilities and companies building infrastructure with borrowed funds may face more expensive new financing. Payments on previously agreed fixed-rate loans do not automatically change as a result.

Stronger consumer spending supports revenue at US retailers and service businesses. The risk would increase if household income continued to stagnate and spending had to be cut. In Europe, chemical and transport companies paying more for energy face the opposite pressure: the same sales can leave less profit. October’s labour-market and price releases will help establish which force is gaining strength.

September’s dollar effect for euro investors differed from the full quarter

At the European Central Bank’s reference rates, one euro bought 1.1596 US dollars on 31 August and 1.1355 on 30 September. The euro weakened by 2.08% during September. If an asset’s dollar value had stayed entirely unchanged, its euro value would have risen by about 2.12% from currency conversion alone, before costs and without currency hedging. That is a separate exchange-rate effect, not the return on US shares.

The full-third-quarter currency effect was much smaller: from the 30 June rate of 1.1394 to 30 September, translating an unchanged dollar asset value into euros would have added about 0.34%. September’s result therefore cannot simply be applied to the whole quarter. A stronger dollar helped a euro investor holding unhedged US assets this month, but a later euro recovery could reverse that effect.

Week

What comes next

  • 2 October: the US September employment report. Changes in employee numbers and wages will help assess whether household income can continue to support spending.
  • 7 October: US weekly fuel inventories; 14 October: September consumer prices. The question is whether finished-fuel stocks continue to fall and whether higher energy costs affect a broader range of prices.
  • 28–29 October: central bank decisions and US growth data. The US central bank decision is scheduled for 28 October; the ECB decision and the first US third-quarter growth estimate for 29 October. These will allow investors to assess actual quarterly growth and the banks’ responses to the new data.

Important. This is general market analysis, not a personal recommendation to buy or sell. Historical data and company results do not guarantee future returns. Forecasts and conditional scenarios may not materialise.

How is the history preserved and updated?

All five periods in this edition share one information date. Week means the latest 7 days, quarter means 90 days, and year means the trailing 12 months. The next dated edition will have a separate URL. This text keeps its date and assessment; later events are not silently inserted into an older edition. Longer periods assess new evidence alongside earlier developments without repeating every headline.

Earlier review editions →

Investment manager Martynas Juška in his office

Professional portfolio management

A plan for your portfolio. No rush.

Let’s discuss your goals, risk tolerance and time horizon. Find out how your portfolio would be built and managed.

Discuss portfolio management

The first conversation is free, with no obligation.