30 days · Market review
30 days: demand holds up, but costs keep rising
Over 30 days, stronger sales receipts met higher bills for imports, energy and borrowing. The US rate increase on 16 September sharpened the question of how much growth reaches company profit. European production differs by sector, so one average cannot tell the whole industrial story.
Period covered: 2026-08-19 – 2026-09-17Information as of 8 min read
On 16 September, the Federal Reserve raised its target range to 3.75–4.00%. August US sales and import-price figures, weekly fuel inventories and July European industrial volumes were also released that day. At this morning’s cutoff, these were completed developments, not upcoming announcements.
Across every time horizon, the test is how much of stronger sales survives after a business pays more for loans, imported products and fuel. A single revenue figure does not show real quantities or profit margins. Policymakers’ longer-term projections do not guarantee the outcome of future meetings.
30 days
What happened
Late August: the economy grew, but consumers chose more cautiously
At the start of this month-long period, there was no basis for calling the whole economy weak. The second estimate of US second-quarter gross domestic product, released on 26 August, showed annualised growth of 1.5%. That is about 0.4% above the previous quarter, not 1.5% growth in three months. Private domestic demand grew faster than the headline measure, so a single figure did not describe conditions for every business.
Consumption data also showed that more dollars spent do not necessarily mean more goods bought. July’s Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, released on 26 August, showed annual price growth of 3.7%. Real consumption expenditure, which removes the effect of prices, increased by less than 0.1% over the month. This distinction is worth remembering when reading companies’ reports of rising revenue.
Technology suppliers showed earned profits, not promises
Technology results provided the strongest counterweight to cost concerns. On 26 August, chip designer NVIDIA reported quarterly revenue of 96.221 billion US dollars, up 106% year on year. Operating profit under US accounting standards grew even faster, by 124%. These are results for the quarter ended 26 July, although the company calls it the second quarter of fiscal 2027.
Semiconductor and infrastructure software company Broadcom also confirmed revenue growth on 2 September. Its quarterly revenue reached 29.6 billion dollars, up 86% year on year. Two companies do not represent the whole sector, but their results show that some demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure has already turned into sales. How much the customers buying that equipment will earn remains a separate question.
Early September: growth and more expensive energy appeared in the same picture
European statistics did not allow a simple choice between good growth and bad inflation. The preliminary euro-area estimate for August, released on 1 September, showed annual consumer price inflation of 3.3%, compared with 2.9% in July. Energy prices rose 14.3% year on year, while services inflation slowed. Prices were moving unevenly, rather than the entire consumer basket getting more expensive at one uniform pace.
On 7 September, euro-area second-quarter growth was revised to 0.6% quarter on quarter. That was a better estimate of an earlier period, not extra growth that suddenly appeared in September. The US increase of 162,000 jobs in August, announced on 4 September, also showed resilience. June and July gains had been much smaller. Businesses still had customers, but that did not make it easier to promise rapid interest rate cuts.
The oil problem was delivery as well as price
Unreliable supply complicated the energy story. On 5 and 8 September, US Central Command reported strikes on Iranian tankers. These are statements from a party to the conflict, not an independent measurement of all oil flows. Even so, they were a reminder that June’s diplomatic agreement did not yet mean shipping had been reliably restored.
The US Energy Information Administration’s 9 September forecast projected an average Brent price of about 90 US dollars per barrel in the second half of the year. That was an increase of 8 dollars, or roughly a tenth, from the previous forecast of 82 dollars. Model inputs were finalised on 3 September, so this revision cannot be attributed to later military statements. It is a forecast, not today’s exchange price. For hauliers and energy-importing industry, what matters is whether actual improvements in supply bring lower bills.
10 September: Europe chose higher interest rates
The European Central Bank decided to raise all three key interest rates by 0.25 percentage points. The deposit facility rate rose from 2.25% to 2.50% on 16 September. The decision has been made, but its effective date is not its announcement date.
In the bank’s forecasts, the energy shock remains an obstacle to returning inflation to its 2% target. That complicates conditions for companies facing higher fuel and borrowing costs at the same time. Banks’ interest income may rise, but weaker customers increase the risk of loan defaults. A central bank rate increase is therefore not equally good news for the entire financial sector.
11 September: annual inflation did not rise, but the monthly message was not reassuring
The US Consumer Price Index, or CPI, rose 3.4% year on year in August, the same as in July. The monthly change, adjusted for normal seasonal patterns, nevertheless accelerated from 0.1% to 0.4%. These data were already released on 11 September; this is not a future event.
The picture excluding food and energy is also mixed. Annual growth slowed from 2.5% to 2.4%, but monthly growth rose from 0.2% to 0.3%. It is therefore inaccurate to say that all price pressure intensified by the same amount. The central bank will have to consider both the pace in recent months and the broader trend.
How can annual inflation stay unchanged while monthly inflation rises?
The annual change compares the price level with the same month a year earlier. The monthly change compares two adjacent months. A new price increase can replace a similar older month, leaving the annual figure unchanged. The measure excluding food and energy helps show the direction of other prices, but does not capture a household’s whole bill.
? How should we read GDP and price indices?
Gross domestic product measures the value of final goods and services produced in an economy. Real growth removes the effect of prices. US quarterly growth is often reported at an annualised rate, as if the same change continued for four quarters. The Consumer Price Index measures a basket of prices weighted by consumption. Its annual and monthly changes have different comparison bases. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index also includes spending made on consumers’ behalf, uses different weights and accounts for changes in the composition of consumption; these two price indices should not be treated as interchangeable.
11 September: the wait for an energy supply recovery grew longer
The International Energy Agency’s 11 September forecast projected a larger fall in oil supply than in demand this year. This is a forecast, not the final annual result.
France’s example: money is available, but it costs more
France’s ten-year government bond yield benchmark was 4.48% on 14 September, compared with 4.19% on 1 September. The move over these sessions is 0.29 percentage points; it is not a monthly investment return. The higher cost of new debt can increase the budget’s interest expense over time, but coupons on existing fixed-rate debt do not automatically change.
Professional portfolio management
A plan for your portfolio. No rush.
Let’s discuss your goals, risk tolerance and time horizon. Find out how your portfolio would be built and managed.
The first conversation is free, with no obligation.
30 days
What matters now
The 16 September decision recast the rate-versus-profit story
Yesterday, the Federal Reserve raised its target range to 3.75–4.00%. Policymakers’ median end-2026 rate projection moved from 3.8% in June to 4.1%, and the end-2027 figure from 3.6% to 4.1%. These are neither guaranteed meeting outcomes nor market-implied probabilities. Across the longer investment horizon, the turn matters because companies financing growth with fresh borrowing face a higher interest bill. Owners of existing fixed-rate bonds also need to watch their market value.
There is a genuine counterweight from demand. US retail and food-services sales for August, reported yesterday, rose 1.2% on the month to $773.9 billion. But those are nominal dollars; import prices rose 0.7% in the same month, so higher revenue does not ensure better margins. When sales grow while goods and borrowing become more expensive, the outcome differs across sectors. Investors need to distinguish quantity sold, profit and the need for debt.
Fuel stocks show that energy risk depends on the product
In yesterday’s US weekly report, crude inventories stood 1% above their five-year seasonal norm. Gasoline was 5% below it, while distillates, including diesel, were 13% below. Crude volume alone therefore cannot answer how much the fuel needed by a haulier or factory will cost. These are US inventories, not a global production measure or a price forecast. An oil producer and a fuel-buying airline may sit on opposite sides of the same portfolio exposure.
In Europe, July industrial production slipped 0.1% on the month, although capital goods rose 0.5% while non-durable consumer goods fell 1.6%. The figures, published yesterday, do not describe every factory as equally weak. The European Central Bank’s deposit facility rate increase to 2.50% took effect on 16 September. More expensive new loans could later impede investment, but the July production figure cannot prove that outcome. The opportunity is sustained orders with stabilising costs; the risk is a narrowing margin if bills rise faster than sales.
30 days
What comes next
What will test the main thesis for this period?
The next signals are Eurostat’s detailed August inflation figures planned for 17 September, the next US weekly fuel-stock report and the US employment release on 2 October. The Federal Reserve meeting on 27–28 October will bring another decision, but its outcome is not known in advance. If volumes sold and corporate margins hold up, today’s cost pressures will be easier to absorb. If prices and interest bills keep rising faster than profit, indebted companies and longer-term bonds will remain under pressure.
Important. This is general market analysis, not a personal recommendation to buy or sell. Historical data and company results do not guarantee future returns. Forecasts and conditional scenarios may not materialise.
How is the history preserved and updated?
All five periods in this edition share one information date. Week means the latest 7 days, quarter means 90 days, and year means the trailing 12 months. The next dated edition will have a separate URL. This text keeps its date and assessment; later events are not silently inserted into an older edition. Longer periods assess new evidence alongside earlier developments without repeating every headline.
