Quarter · Market review
90 days: hopes of easier finance gave way to higher rates
Across 90 days, hopes of more reliable energy supply met renewed price and financing risks. Europe raised rates and the US followed yesterday. Stronger consumer sales offer a counterweight, but import and fuel costs can erode profit. Earlier events remain clearly dated in this account.
Period covered: 2026-06-20 – 2026-09-17Information as of 8 min read
On 16 September, the Federal Reserve raised its target range to 3.75–4.00%. August US sales and import-price figures, weekly fuel inventories and July European industrial volumes were also released that day. At this morning’s cutoff, these were completed developments, not upcoming announcements.
Across every time horizon, the test is how much of stronger sales survives after a business pays more for loans, imported products and fuel. A single revenue figure does not show real quantities or profit margins. Policymakers’ longer-term projections do not guarantee the outcome of future meetings.
Quarter
What happened
The starting point: interest rates had already risen on 17 June
This 90-day period begins on 20 June. Before it began, on 17 June, the European Central Bank’s previously announced interest rate increase took effect. The rate on banks’ overnight deposits rose from 2.00% to 2.25%. These are the initial conditions before the period under review, not a new event within it.
Also on 17 June, the Federal Reserve left the federal funds target range at 3.50–3.75%. It made no change on 29 July. Europe also chose a pause on 23 July. For a business with debt, this meant that energy costs would not be offset by automatically and rapidly falling interest rates.
The starting backdrop: the 18 June agreement had not yet restored shipping
The US–Iran memorandum was presented as a route towards ending hostilities and reopening the Strait of Hormuz. The economic benefit depended on what happened after the signatures: could ships sail safely, would insurance be available, and would oil actually reach buyers?
More reliable deliveries would have reduced importing industries’ need to hold expensive inventories. Hauliers would have found fuel and route planning easier. But the agreement itself was not a statistical record of restored flows. July and August data later required a more cautious assessment of precisely this assumption.
July: the supply recovery was not sustained
The International Energy Agency’s 10 July review described a partial recovery in June flows and ceasefire violations on 7–8 July. Its 12 August report said Persian Gulf oil exports in July, including routes bypassing the strait, averaged 15 million barrels per day. That was 2.1 million, or about 12%, below June.
This comparison describes two monthly averages, not a one-day shipping halt. It showed that June’s hopes had not been enough to deliver a lasting improvement. US military statements on 5 and 8 September about strikes on Iranian tankers were a reminder that delivery security remained unresolved. A particular price move cannot be attributed solely to these statements.
23 July: trade rules and sanctions added to the planning burden
The European Union’s 21st sanctions package against Russia expanded restrictions on energy, financial services and the shadow fleet. For companies, this matters beyond politics: payment, insurance and cargo transport options change. But an announced restriction is not a measured fall in exports of the same size.
On the same day, the Office of the US Trade Representative announced measures concerning 60 economies under Section 301 of the Trade Act. Tariff treatment depended on the product, origin and exemptions. A broad tariff headline was therefore not enough for an importer: the specific supply chain had to be assessed. This legal and logistical burden added conditions that an oil price chart alone cannot show.
Late July and August: the technology transaction had two sides
Demand for technology was visible both in sellers’ revenue and in customers’ investment bills. On 29 July, Microsoft reported capital expenditure, including finance leases, of 41 billion US dollars for the quarter ended 30 June. Cash purchases of property and equipment were 35.8 billion dollars. These amounts must not be added together: the first includes finance leases, while the second shows asset purchases paid for in cash during the quarter.
The company generated 55.4 billion dollars in operating cash flow. Subtracting cash purchases of property and equipment left 19.6 billion dollars. This explains why a rapid pace of construction is not automatically a bad signal: what matters is how much cash the business generates and how much more it needs from outside.
On 26 August, chip designer NVIDIA reported revenue of 96.221 billion dollars for the quarter ended 26 July, up 106% year on year. Operating profit grew 124%. Some customer spending had therefore already become real earnings for the supplier. For customers to earn a return on their investments, however, their new services need demand and must cover equipment, electricity and financing costs.
August and September: growth continued, but costs did not disappear
Economic data showed resilience, not a general halt in growth. The second estimate of US second-quarter gross domestic product showed annualised growth of 1.5%, or about 0.4% quarter on quarter. Euro-area growth was revised to 0.6% quarter on quarter on 7 September. These figures need to be put on the same time basis before comparing the regions.
The US added 162,000 jobs in August; the data were released on 4 September. On 9 September, second-quarter revenue growth in selected US service industries was revised to 3.0% from the previous quarter. This revenue measure has not been adjusted for prices. Rising sales and a greater real volume of services delivered are therefore not the same thing.
9–11 September: the energy question reached monetary policy
On 9 September, the US Energy Information Administration raised its second-half average Brent price forecast to about 90 dollars per barrel. Model inputs were finalised on 3 September. This is a conditional average for a future period, not the oil price on 15 September and not an already measured effect of later military action.
On 10 September, the European Central Bank announced another interest rate increase of 0.25 percentage points. The deposit facility rate rose from 2.25% to 2.50% on 16 September. On 11 September, the US Consumer Price Index showed annual inflation of 3.4% in August, the same as in July. The seasonally adjusted monthly change accelerated from 0.1% to 0.4%. These data are already known and form a new backdrop to the Federal Reserve meeting of 15–16 September.
? How should we read GDP and price indices?
Gross domestic product measures the value of final goods and services produced in an economy. Real growth removes the effect of prices. US quarterly growth is often reported at an annualised rate, as if the same change continued for four quarters. The Consumer Price Index measures a basket of prices weighted by consumption. Its annual and monthly changes have different comparison bases. The Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index also includes spending made on consumers’ behalf, uses different weights and accounts for changes in the composition of consumption; these two price indices should not be treated as interchangeable.
Mid-September: June’s hopes were not enough to restore supply
The International Energy Agency’s 11 September forecast projected a larger fall in oil supply than in demand this year. This is a forecast, not the final annual result.
Lower demand does not automatically mean cheaper oil. If the volume reaching buyers falls faster, fuel bills can remain high even as the economy slows. This can help an energy producer only if it can deliver its output. For a haulier or an energy-buying factory, the same situation raises costs.
Professional portfolio management
A plan for your portfolio. No rush.
Let’s discuss your goals, risk tolerance and time horizon. Find out how your portfolio would be built and managed.
The first conversation is free, with no obligation.
Quarter
What matters now
The 16 September decision recast the rate-versus-profit story
Yesterday, the Federal Reserve raised its target range to 3.75–4.00%. Policymakers’ median end-2026 rate projection moved from 3.8% in June to 4.1%, and the end-2027 figure from 3.6% to 4.1%. These are neither guaranteed meeting outcomes nor market-implied probabilities. Across the longer investment horizon, the turn matters because companies financing growth with fresh borrowing face a higher interest bill. Owners of existing fixed-rate bonds also need to watch their market value.
There is a genuine counterweight from demand. US retail and food-services sales for August, reported yesterday, rose 1.2% on the month to $773.9 billion. But those are nominal dollars; import prices rose 0.7% in the same month, so higher revenue does not ensure better margins. When sales grow while goods and borrowing become more expensive, the outcome differs across sectors. Investors need to distinguish quantity sold, profit and the need for debt.
Fuel stocks show that energy risk depends on the product
In yesterday’s US weekly report, crude inventories stood 1% above their five-year seasonal norm. Gasoline was 5% below it, while distillates, including diesel, were 13% below. Crude volume alone therefore cannot answer how much the fuel needed by a haulier or factory will cost. These are US inventories, not a global production measure or a price forecast. An oil producer and a fuel-buying airline may sit on opposite sides of the same portfolio exposure.
In Europe, July industrial production slipped 0.1% on the month, although capital goods rose 0.5% while non-durable consumer goods fell 1.6%. The figures, published yesterday, do not describe every factory as equally weak. The European Central Bank’s deposit facility rate increase to 2.50% took effect on 16 September. More expensive new loans could later impede investment, but the July production figure cannot prove that outcome. The opportunity is sustained orders with stabilising costs; the risk is a narrowing margin if bills rise faster than sales.
Quarter
What comes next
What will test the main thesis for this period?
The next signals are Eurostat’s detailed August inflation figures planned for 17 September, the next US weekly fuel-stock report and the US employment release on 2 October. The Federal Reserve meeting on 27–28 October will bring another decision, but its outcome is not known in advance. If volumes sold and corporate margins hold up, today’s cost pressures will be easier to absorb. If prices and interest bills keep rising faster than profit, indebted companies and longer-term bonds will remain under pressure.
Important. This is general market analysis, not a personal recommendation to buy or sell. Historical data and company results do not guarantee future returns. Forecasts and conditional scenarios may not materialise.
How is the history preserved and updated?
All five periods in this edition share one information date. Week means the latest 7 days, quarter means 90 days, and year means the trailing 12 months. The next dated edition will have a separate URL. This text keeps its date and assessment; later events are not silently inserted into an older edition. Longer periods assess new evidence alongside earlier developments without repeating every headline.
